Search results

skip to primary navigation skip to content

Showing 1-3 of 3 records with:

Joan Beston (PERSON19022) in participant
No in practitioner-is-patient

Refine your results

Practitioner details

Astrologer details

Patient details

How & where did it take place

When did it take place

Consultation details

Person asking the question

Editorial information

Top ten

manuscript page thumbnail

CASE29238: Horary consultation concerning Joan Beston (PERSON19022)

Question asked by the patient on 16 June 1605 at 07:00

RN Ione Beston of Brackly 40 y. Iune 16 ☉ h. 7. ant m 1605

[Astrological Chart]

Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 216, f. 121v (upper left part of page)

Joan Beston (PERSON19022)

Medical (Not specified in question)

Practitioner: Mr Richard Napier [Sandy] (PERSON5218) Judgment Astrological Chart

manuscript page thumbnail

CASE30313: Horary consultation concerning Joan Beston (PERSON19022)

Question asked by the patient on 14 November 1606 at 15:00

RN Ione Beston of Brackly. 43 y novēb 14 ♀ h. 3. p m 1606.

[Astrological Chart]

Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 193, f. 25r (bottom left part of page)

Joan Beston (PERSON19022)

Medical (Not specified in question)

Practitioner: Mr Richard Napier [Sandy] (PERSON5218) Treatment Judgment PaymentAstrological Chart

manuscript page thumbnail

CASE41667: Horary consultation concerning Joan Beston (PERSON19022)

Question asked by the patient on 23 July 1613 at 07:00

RN Ioane Beston of Brackly 48 y Iuly 23 ♀. ho. 7. a. m. 1613

Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 199, f. 176v (upper left part of page)

Joan Beston (PERSON19022)

Medical (Not specified in question)

Practitioner: Mr Richard Napier [Sandy] (PERSON5218) Treatment Judgment

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f1-participant=Joan%20Beston%20%28PERSON19022%29;f2-practitioner-is-patient=No, accessed 19 April 2025.