skip to primary navigationskip to content

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • Unknown in patient-sex 
  • 1630-1639 in date 
  • No in damaged 
  • Explicitly not given in patient-consent 
  • MS Ashmole 194 in shelfmark 
  • English in language 
  • Astrological chart in info 
  • No in judgment 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Document type

Practitioner details

Practice
Number of practitioners
Practitioner is querent
Practitioner is patient

Astrologer details

Practitioner is astrologer
Number of astrologers

Patient details

Patient is
  • Unknown
Number of patients

How & where did it take place

Querent is asking about
Consultation took place with patient's knowledge
Patient's consent to the consultation is
  • Explicitly not given
How did it take place

When did it take place

Time of day

Consultation details

Question asked
Case contains information about
Case contains judgment
  • No
Case includes treatment information
Case contains recipe

Person asking the question

Querent is
Querent is identified
Number of querents

Editorial information

Shelfmark
  • MS Ashmole 194
Volume name
Case deleted
Case text damaged
  • No
Language
Extent of transcription

Top ten

manuscript page thumbnail

CASE70902: Horary consultation concerning M H (PERSON50548) and J T (PERSON59864)

Question asked by Anonymous (PERSON41197) on 24 May 1630 at 13:25

SRN Vtrū erit Conjugiū inter M H. & I T Denbighs RN May 24. . h 1. 20|5| p m. 1630 |sine cons. vtriusq tis.|

[Astrological Chart]

Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 194, p. 403 (upper left part of page)

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f1-patient-sex=Unknown;f2-date=1630-1639;f4-damaged=No;f5-patient-consent=Explicitly%20not%20given;f6-shelfmark=MS%20Ashmole%20194;f7-language=English;f8-info=Astrological%20chart;f9-judgment=No, accessed 11 August 2024.