skip to primary navigationskip to content

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • No in practitioner-is-patient 
  • No in judgment 
  • Medical in question-asked 
  • PM in time-of-day 
  • Yes in damaged 
  • Explicitly not given in patient-consent 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Document type

Practitioner details

Practice
Number of practitioners
Practitioner is querent
Practitioner is patient
  • No

Astrologer details

Practitioner is astrologer
Number of astrologers

Patient details

Patient is
Patient’s age
Number of patients

How & where did it take place

Querent is asking about
Consultation took place with patient's knowledge
Patient's consent to the consultation is
  • Explicitly not given
How did it take place

When did it take place

Date
Time of day

Consultation details

Case contains information about
Case contains judgment
  • No
Case includes treatment information
Case contains recipe

Person asking the question

Querent is
Querent is identified
Number of querents

Editorial information

Shelfmark
Volume name
Case deleted
Case text damaged
  • Yes
Language
Extent of transcription

Top ten

Querents
manuscript page thumbnail

CASE78599: Horary consultation concerning John Grigs (PERSON50429)

Question asked by Grigs (PERSON50431) on 13 November 1633 at 14:00

RN Iohn Grigs of Henes in Hontingdon sheere 40 y novēb 13 h 2 p m 1633 |A day {illeg}| |vxor marito| /sine consensu\1

[Astrological Chart]

Notes:

1 ‘Iealousy touching te{illeg}’ in chart

Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 412, f. 31r (upper left part of page)

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f1-practitioner-is-patient=No;f2-judgment=No;f4-question-asked=Medical;f5-time-of-day=PM;f6-damaged=Yes;f7-patient-consent=Explicitly%20not%20given, accessed 27 May 2024.