skip to primary navigationskip to content

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • AM in time-of-day 
  • 010-019::18 in patient-age-band 
  • No in practitioner-is-querent 
  • Explicitly not given in patient-consent 
  • No in deleted 
  • Margaret Winstanly [Buck] (PERSON7959) in patient 
  • Yes in judgment 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Document type

Practitioner details

Practice
Number of practitioners
Practitioner is querent
  • No
Practitioner is patient

Astrologer details

Practitioner is astrologer
Number of astrologers

Patient details

Patient is
Patient’s age
Number of patients

How & where did it take place

Querent is asking about
Consultation took place with patient's knowledge
Patient's consent to the consultation is
  • Explicitly not given
How did it take place

When did it take place

Date
Time of day

Consultation details

Question asked
Case contains information about
Case contains judgment
  • Yes
Case includes treatment information
Case contains recipe

Person asking the question

Querent is
Querent is identified
Number of querents

Editorial information

Shelfmark
Volume name
Case deleted
  • No
Case text damaged
Hands
Language
Extent of transcription

Top ten

Patients
  • Margaret Winstanly [Buck] (PERSON7959)
manuscript page thumbnail

CASE7937: Horary consultation concerning Margaret Winstanly [Buck] (PERSON7959)

Question asked by Winstanly (PERSON7957) on 30 July 1600 at 09:30

SF Margaret Wynstanly of 18 years 1600 the 30 of Iulij . An’ m’ 30 p 9 Diz at blackwell halle/. the mother for the Daughter wthout her Consent./

[Astrological Chart]

Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 236, f. 178r (upper right part of page)

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f1-time-of-day=AM;f2-patient-age-band=010-019%3A%3A18;f3-practitioner-is-querent=No;f4-patient-consent=Explicitly%20not%20given;f5-deleted=No;f6-patient=Margaret%20Winstanly%20%5BBuck%5D%20%28PERSON7959%29;f7-judgment=Yes, accessed 29 July 2024.