skip to primary navigationskip to content

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • No in treatment 
  • Explicitly not given in patient-consent 
  • 1630-1639::1632::02::06 in date 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Document type

Practitioner details

Practice
Number of practitioners
Practitioner is querent
Practitioner is patient

Astrologer details

Practitioner is astrologer
Number of astrologers

Patient details

Patient is
Patient’s age
Number of patients

How & where did it take place

Querent is asking about
Consultation took place with patient's knowledge
Patient's consent to the consultation is
  • Explicitly not given
How did it take place

When did it take place

Time of day

Consultation details

Question asked
Case contains information about
Case contains judgment
Case includes treatment information
  • No
Case contains recipe

Person asking the question

Querent is
Querent’s age
Querent is identified
Number of querents

Editorial information

Shelfmark
Volume name
Case deleted
Case text damaged
Language
Extent of transcription
manuscript page thumbnail

CASE73751: Horary consultation concerning Sir Robert Sandy [Napier] [Baronet] [Old Sir Robert Napier] [Mr Robert Sandy [Napier]] (PERSON6315)

Question asked by Mr Richard Napier [the nephew] [Sir Richard Napier] (PERSON18784) on 6 February 1632 at 17:15

RN Mr {sic} |Sr| Rich: Nap nepos quærit vtrū fratr Robertus maritebit my lord Bridgwaters daughter. feb. 6. h. 5. 15 p p {sic} m 1632 sine cōsensu

[Astrological Chart]

Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 212, p. 430 (upper left, and upper right parts of page)

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f1-treatment=No;f2-patient-consent=Explicitly%20not%20given;f3-date=1630-1639%3A%3A1632%3A%3A02%3A%3A06, accessed 17 November 2024.