skip to primary navigationskip to content

Casebooks

Casebooks

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • Explicitly not given in patient-consent 
  • Unclear in how-did-it-take-place 
  • Napier, vol. 07 in volume-name 
  • Unknown in question-asked 
  • Case in document-type 
  • No in practitioner-is-patient 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Document type

Practitioner details

Practice
Practitioner
Number of practitioners
Practitioner is querent
Practitioner is patient
  • No

Astrologer details

Astrologer
Practitioner is astrologer
Number of astrologers

Patient details

Patient is
Patient’s age
Number of patients

How & where did it take place

Querent is asking about
Consultation took place with patient's knowledge
Patient's consent to the consultation is
  • Explicitly not given
How did it take place

When did it take place

Date
Time of day

Consultation details

Question asked
  • Unknown
Case contains judgment
Case includes treatment information
Case contains recipe

Person asking the question

Querent is
Querent is identified
Number of querents

Editorial information

Shelfmark
Volume name
  • Napier, vol. 07
Case deleted
Case text damaged
Hands
Language
Extent of transcription

Top ten

Patients
Querents
manuscript page thumbnail

CASE15991: Horary consultation concerning Mary Clark (PERSON10629)

Question asked by Anonymous (PERSON18124) on 26 December 1603 at 11:40

RN Mary Clarke 30 y decēb 26 ☾ hor 11 40 ant m 1603.

mater maria sine consensu

Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 207, f. 172v (upper left part of page)

Anonymous (PERSON18124)Mary Clark (PERSON10629)

Unknown 

Practitioner: Mr Richard Napier [Sandy] (PERSON5218)

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f10-patient-consent=Explicitly%20not%20given;f11-how-did-it-take-place=Unclear;f12-volume-name=Napier%2C%20vol.%2007;f3-question-asked=Unknown;f4-document-type=Case;f9-practitioner-is-patient=No, accessed 29 June 2024.

Browse casebooks

Search

Forman’s Judgmentes and Napier’s Defence

Reading the casebooks

Who were the practitioners?

Who were the patients?

Using the casebooks

The manuscripts

Casebooks sites

Study at Cambridge

About the University

Research at Cambridge