CASE52936: Horary consultation concerning Richard Woodward (PERSON26154)
Question asked by Mr Thomas Archer (PERSON27431) on 8 August 1621 at 14:00
RN Richard Woodward of Houghton Conquest 40 y {illeg} {sic} Aug. 8. ☿ h 2. p m. 162i |mr Archer wrote a most kind lettr in his behalfe| |mopish & fearfull will take no physick|
[Astrological Chart]
Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 231, f. 62v (upper left part of page)
CASE53317: Horary consultation concerning Mrs Frances Howard [Prannell] [Frances Seymour [Countess of Hertford]] [Frances [Duchess of Lennox]] [Frances [Duchess of Richmond]] (PERSON3941)
Question asked by Sir Robert Sandy [Napier] [Baronet] [Old Sir Robert Napier] [Mr Robert Sandy [Napier]] (PERSON6315) on 6 November 1621 at 18:30
RN The Dutches would take Some thing of me god willing to have a child novēb. 6 ♂ h. 6. 30 p m 162i |Sr Rob in her behalfe vtrū ab. filiū vl filiolā|
[Astrological Chart]
Transcribed excerpt from MS Ashmole 231, f. 133r (bottom left part of page)
CASE53577: Horary consultation concerning Mrs Frances Howard [Prannell] [Frances Seymour [Countess of Hertford]] [Frances [Duchess of Lennox]] [Frances [Duchess of Richmond]] (PERSON3941)
Question asked by Sir Robert Sandy [Napier] [Baronet] [Old Sir Robert Napier] [Mr Robert Sandy [Napier]] (PERSON6315) on 16 February 1622 at 19:28 or at 19:00
RN Sr Rob quærit vtrū Ducissa sit gravida feb 16 h {sic} hor 7. 28 p m. 1622
Sr Rob quærit vtrū Duchissa sit gravid feb 16 h. 7. p m 1622.
Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 231, f. 184v (bottom left part of page)
