CASE54931: Nativity for George Villiers [First Duke of Buckingham] [Lord Marquess of Buckingham] (PERSON60852)
Question asked by Anonymous (PERSON39539) on 14 September 1622 between 12:50 and 14:00
RN the Marq borne Aug 28 ♀ h. 3. 30 ant m 1590|2| {sic} |1592|
[Partial Astrological Chart]
Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 222, f. 54v (upper left part of page)
CASE54933: Nativity for George Villiers [First Duke of Buckingham] [Lord Marquess of Buckingham] (PERSON60852)
Question asked by Anonymous (PERSON39541) on 14 September 1622 between 12:50 and 14:00
RN The Marq: borne Aug 28 ♃|♀| \☾/ h. 15. ant m. 1622 1590|2| 1597 |1592|
[Partial Astrological Chart]
[Partial Astrological Chart]
Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 222, f. 54v (upper right part of page)
CASE54935: Nativity for George Villiers [First Duke of Buckingham] [Lord Marquess of Buckingham] (PERSON60852)
Question asked by Anonymous (PERSON39542) on 14 September 1622 between 12:50 and 14:00
RN The Lord Marq |otherwise Vyllers Marq of Buck| Aug 28 ♃ 15. p m 1592 1595. credo si illo {runo} sit natus esse {temp:} ♃ h. 14. 30 p m 1595 |this is the more likely figure|
[Astrological Chart]
Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 222, f. 55v (upper left, and upper right parts of page)
CASE54937: Nativity for George Villiers [First Duke of Buckingham] [Lord Marquess of Buckingham] (PERSON60852)
Question asked by Mr Richard Napier [Sandy] [Richard Napier [Senior]] (PERSON5218) on 14 September 1622 between 12:50 and 14:00
RN \questo/ The L Marq of Buck borne Aug 28. ♀ h. 3. 30 ant m 1590|2| /mightely grand & advanced by the king & very sperous\1
[Astrological Chart]
Notes:
1‘
false.
not then borne but long after.
’ in chart
Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 222, f. 56r (upper left part of page)
