skip to primary navigationskip to content

Casebooks

Casebooks

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • Self in querent-is-asking-about 
  • 1600-1609::1605::02 in date 
  • No in querent-identified 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Document type

Practitioner details

Practice
Practitioner
Number of practitioners
Practitioner is querent
Practitioner is patient

Astrologer details

Astrologer
Practitioner is astrologer
Number of astrologers

Patient details

Patient is
Number of patients

How & where did it take place

Querent is asking about
  • Self
Consultation took place with patient's knowledge
Patient's consent to the consultation is
How did it take place

When did it take place

Date
Time of day

Consultation details

Question asked
Case contains information about
Case contains judgment
Case includes treatment information
Case contains recipe

Person asking the question

Querent is
Querent is identified
  • No
Number of querents

Editorial information

Shelfmark
Volume name
Case deleted
Case text damaged
Hands
Language
Extent of transcription

Top ten

Patients
Querents
manuscript page thumbnail

CASE21974: Horary consultation concerning an Anonymous (PERSON18710)

Question asked by the patient on 28 February 1605 at 10:45

RN two of Bletchly for cattell sollen {sic} feb 28 last ♃ h 10 45. ant m 1605. /on stoll his sheepe\

[Astrological Chart]

Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 415, f. 224r (upper right part of page)

Anonymous (PERSON18710)

Personal affairs (Loss and theft)

Practitioner: Mr Richard Napier [Sandy] (PERSON5218) Astrological Chart

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f2-querent-is-asking-about=Self;f3-date=1600-1609%3A%3A1605%3A%3A02;f4-querent-identified=No, accessed 23 December 2024.

Browse casebooks

Search

Forman’s Judgmentes and Napier’s Defence

Reading the casebooks

Who were the practitioners?

Who were the patients?

Using the casebooks

The manuscripts

Casebooks sites

Study at Cambridge

About the University

Research at Cambridge