skip to primary navigationskip to content

Casebooks

Casebooks

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • Third party in identified-entity-was-never 
  • Not recorded in dob-cert 
  • Yes in social-network-recorded 
  • Yes in occupation-mentioned 
  • Self in identified-entity-is-asking-about 
  • Identified entity in document-type 
  • Querent in identified-entity-was-never 
  • Sex, family and generation in entity-question-asked 
  • Only mentioned in identified-entity-was-never 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Idenfitied entities

Identified entity is
Identified entity was never
  • Only mentioned
  • Querent
  • Third party
Person is
Identified entity is asking about
Date of birth
  • Not recorded
Date of death
Question asked
Occupation mentioned
  • Yes
Occupation
Residence mentioned
Event mentioned
Identified entity practice
Member of the gentry
Social network recorded
  • Yes

Anonymous (PERSON40027)

Male, b. not recorded, d. not recorded

Occupations: ‘Man (servant)’, c. 7 February 1625; ‘Servant’, c. 15 February 1625

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f6-identified-entity-was-never=Third%20party;f15-dob-cert=Not%20recorded;f16-social-network-recorded=Yes;f17-occupation-mentioned=Yes;f18-identified-entity-is-asking-about=Self;f20-document-type=Identified%20entity;f21-identified-entity-was-never=Querent;f22-entity-question-asked=Sex%2C%20family%20and%20generation;f23-identified-entity-was-never=Only%20mentioned, accessed 16 May 2025.

Browse casebooks

Search

Forman’s Judgmentes and Napier’s Defence

Reading the casebooks

Who were the practitioners?

Who were the patients?

Using the casebooks

The manuscripts

Casebooks sites

Study at Cambridge

About the University

Research at Cambridge