skip to primary navigationskip to content

Search results

Display  

Showing 1 of 1 record with:

  • Yes in judgment 
  • Urine::Described but not explicitly present in info 
  • Yes in practitioner-is-patient 
 Sorted by:  

Refine your results

Document type

Practitioner details

Practice
Number of practitioners
Practitioner is querent
Practitioner is patient
  • Yes

Astrologer details

Practitioner is astrologer
Number of astrologers

Patient details

Patient is
Patient’s age
Number of patients

How & where did it take place

Querent is asking about
Consultation took place with patient's knowledge
Patient's consent to the consultation is
How did it take place

When did it take place

Date
Time of day

Consultation details

Question asked
Case contains information about
Case contains judgment
  • Yes
Case includes treatment information
Case contains recipe

Person asking the question

Querent is
Querent’s age
Querent is identified
Number of querents

Editorial information

Shelfmark
Volume name
Case deleted
Case text damaged
Language
Extent of transcription
manuscript page thumbnail

CASE69659: Diary entry

Written by Mr Richard Napier [Sandy] [Richard Napier [Senior]] (PERSON5218) between 4 November 1629 at 07:15 and 5 November 1629 at 11:00

RN I receaved a{n} Answer frō the old m{ā} novēb 2. {h} 2. 20 p m 1629

[Astrological Chart]

Transcribed entry from MS Ashmole 406, f. 316v (upper right part of page)

Cite this as: Lauren Kassell, Michael Hawkins, Robert Ralley, John Young, Joanne Edge, Janet Yvonne Martin-Portugues, and Natalie Kaoukji (eds.), The casebooks of Simon Forman and Richard Napier, 1596–1634: a digital edition, https://casebooks.lib.cam.ac.uk/search?f7-judgment=Yes;f8-info=Urine%3A%3ADescribed%20but%20not%20explicitly%20present;f9-practitioner-is-patient=Yes, accessed 14 November 2024.